Posts by Avanar

Hm.. mache ich was falsch oder funktioniert die Rundumleuchte nicht so gut?

1. ich kann leider die Farbe nicht ändern, gibts wirklich nur Rot?

2. kann man die Geschwindigkeit nicht manuell anpassen?

3. egal wie ich die Helligkeit einstelle, ich merke keinen Unterschied

4. auch bei Schatten ein/aus sehe ich keinen Unterschied

Sehr schön gemacht, danke für die Bilder!

Und weiterhin gute Besserung

Ah you are playing Java version. Good old times

mhhh Goat milk. Now add some goat cheese please

Not sure what you mean. There is a bed made from straw / dried grass in Unity version.

Quote from FioO

Auch cool, das du gleich nen Screenshot von den Blaupausen Speicher Infos mit raushaust. 👍

Als Warnung, ja

Hallo,
ich hatte zuvor schon eine Bibliothek gebaut, diese hier aber ist dafür gedacht unterirdisch verbaut zu werden und passt gut in eine Zwergenstadt. Die Regale, Bücher, Tische, etc. habe ich selbst gebaut. Lediglich den Kronleuchter habe ich mir von nase211 ausgeliehen (Java-Version) und habe ihn mit Unity-Fackeln ausgestattet.

Aber Vorsicht: es sind sehr viele Bauteile und könnte den einen oder anderen Rechner in die Knie zwingen

Viel Spaß!


Hello,
i have built a library before but this one is meant to be used underground and fits very well into a dwarven city. The shelves, books, tables, etc. i have built by my own. Just the chandelier i have taken from nase211 (Java-version) and added some Unity-torches.

But be warned: there are a lot of building pieces and it might bring some computers on their knees

Have fun!

Quote from Ludy

da geht es um das Shop updayt
das heist auf Staem dann dei aktuelle version die Uinty ist und nicht mehr die Java
das muß nicht bedeuten das wir was neues bekommen

Doch, weil dieser Switch nicht "einfach so" kommt, sondern die wichtigsten noch fehlenden Features in Unity implementiert werden müssen bevor Unity die Hauptversion wird.

Soweit Red gesagt hat wird es 2 Updates geben bis Ende des Jahres. 1x mit Content und dann kurz danach das Verschieben der Java-Version in den Beta-Branch und der Unity-Version zur Hauptversion. Sowohl bei unseren Spieleverzeichnissen als auch auf Steam.

Quote from Deirdre

Rising World is the only game in which I play creatively. I play Survival and PvP in other games.

and thats why you dont need such survival-blueprints in rising world

Quote from Desmagu

I play in creative but in survival as well an I don't like the idea that enemies could break my defence walls or steal my stuff. I would rather loot their stuff . I hope bandits will get their own base to protect their treasures.

No problem with the system I suggested. You won't be effected

Quote from Deirdre

In all my years I've been playing Rising World I've never heard anyone talk about something like this. In the last week's one person who asks about bandits destroying buildings, but never till to that date. In my opinion something like this is not necessary in Rising World.

not for you as you play only creative but i have read about it multiple times and i also would like such a feature from time to time

Quote from red51

Are there really lots of people looking for such a feature? A demand for npcs/bandits attacking or raiding player bases (breaking down walls etc) indeed comes up from time to time (and some people are definitely looking for such a feature), but it's hard to tell how many people in the community really want this feature

Honestly I'm not sure if such a feature would work well in RW... unlike in other games, the building system isn't made for this... ideally the game needs a simplified building mechanic for that (where you just use modular walls, foundations, roofs etc, i.e build a base quickly with very few elements, like in most other games). With the current building system, there is a chance that such a feature would mostly result in a lot of frustration for a new player who isn't expecting this (who spend a lot of time creating a detailed building and who may not be aware of blueprints yet)

The building system also makes it quite easy (too easy?) for players to avoid bandit attacks. A player could create obstacles bandits couldn't pass anyway (e.g. create walls consisting of countless layers of thin blocks etc), so I'm not sure if such a feature really adds much of a "challenge" to the game.

IMHO it would be more reasonable if bandits can only break through objects like doors, for example. However, the game definitely needs better pathfinding for npcs before we can implement something like that (or tinker with base raids etc in general). It's quite difficult to implement proper pathfinding in RW, mostly due to the building system (buildings could consist of so many building elements which would quickly kill performance if we take a traditional approach on pathfinding), so unfortunately it will require quite some work (definitely something for the post-storepage-update era)

About your suggestion regarding blueprint tags specifically, basically it's not a bad idea to have tags for building elements in general, but what would prevent a player from just assigning the "interieur" tag to his entire building (and therefore preventing bandits from breaking in)? If a player can easily circumvent base raids, I'm not sure if it that feature would be really useful?

Display More

From what i read on the forums a big part of the current survival-community and the potential ones who dont buy the game without more survival, would want such a feature.

The idea with breaking only doors is ok of course but you intend to give us the opportunity to build our own doors - would those be a target of bandits as well then?

And yes, as i mentioned someone could of course tag a wall as "interieur" and be safe. Thats the idea - a server owner/admin can determine if such blueprints are allowed at all and the individual player can decide if they want bandit raids or not. Each to their own.

About new players - i dont think this would be an issue. As mentioned standard blueprints without tags would be still available (you have to check a box when creating a blue print, just like already with including terrain, objects, etc. or not). Therefore if they don´t notice this feature right away they would be safe.

Maybe if a structure is not blueprinted at all the bandits follow the standard path - breaking only through objects as you suggested. For new players this would be no threat then and only when they decide they want to participate (and maybe only for a part of their building) they could blueprint their buildings and tag them this way. The tag would / should also work for built stuff that is getting blueprinted the first time, not only if you place a blueprint.

red51 - lots of people want to see more aggressive or challenging Bandit-AI in the game, others (incl. myself) are afraid Bandits attacking buildings could ruin the work of weeks and months. Also stuff like cups made from "blocks", statues and other things should be no aim for bandits but for the AI it would be hard to distinguish between a defensive wall to break and a complex statue just standing in the way.

My suggestion would be therefore the following:

Currently there is just 1 type of Blueprint. But wouldn´t it be possible when blueprinting something to add a (optional) tag or marking to the blueprint?

Lets say:

Blueprint without tag/mark = regular blueprint, not to be attacked by bandits when placed, needs no ressources in survival

Blueprint with a tag/mark for "interieur" (i.e. tables, cupboards, chairs, etc.) = not to be attacked by bandits when placed, need a balanced amout of ressources in survival (i.e. if 100 building elements used it needs 50 wood and 50 metal bars to place)

Blueprint with a tag/mark for "decoration" (i.e. picture frames, cups, bottles, etc.) = same as above but with other ressources (i.e. with 50 building elements = 25 sand and 25 stone or metal)

Blueprints with a tag/mark for "building" (i.e. house for living, barn, etc.) = bandits dont attack structures, just objects like doors to break inside and go directly either for players, beds or chests. need a balanced amount of ressources in survival (i.e. if 1000 building elements used it needs 500 wood and 250 stone and 250 metal)

Blueprints with a tag/mark for "wall" (i.e. defensive wall, garden fence, etc.) = bandits attack this structure directly until there is a gap in it, then go through it. they destroy it when its in their way. also needs balanced amount of ressources in survival (i.e. if 1000 building elements used it could be 500 wood and 500 stone).


with "balanced amount" i mean that the required ressources should be set in the background, not depending on what material/texture was actually used. But it should actually scale with the amount of building elements used in the blueprint.

What would be a motivation to use a blueprint at all in survival? Well, thats up to each server owner i would say. For example buildings that aren´t blueprinted could be not protected at all from bandits or bandits may spawn even close by or inside walls or maybe tress don´t regrow, etc. just some ideas.

With that system there would be a reason (outside creative) to blueprint and the problem of bandits being no threat in survival once you are behind a wall would be subject to each player on his or her own. Of course someone could also blueprint a wall and tag it with "interieur" so bandits dont attack it. That would be individual decision and hence adding to the individual possibilities of this game.

Once a structure with a tag is placed each building object has this tag saved in the background of course. If it is removed and replaced the tag is gone only for this building element, the rest remains untouched.

What do you think?

Super Idee. Gefällt mir

Quote from hkurzawa

Wird es auch möglich sein Plugins für Java auch in der aktuellen Version verwenden zu können? Was bitte ist ein Shopupdate?

Die plug-ins der Java müssten, soweit ich weiß, für die unity Version umgeschrieben werden. Und die meisten wurden bereits angepasst.

Ein shopupdate folgt wenn endlich die unity Version von der beta zur Haupt Version wird und die Java ihren Ruhestand im beta branch genießen darf

Weil dann muss auch für shop Seite auf steam angepasst werden

Well, hardly without explanation. This post here was done 3 days ago.

Maybe RnHG will tell more about it

Quote from Sherrina

Drums of Africa??? At least thats what I played yesterday, for a few hours. This morning, that is gone, all my work lost. And now you have another one - pacific island or something!!! Not exactly player friendly to keep creating servers that people play on, only to have everything lost...

What to do if the server provider can't get the software to work properly?

And in general is a risk of you play on servers. No guarantee that your buildings survive a reset.

But you might ask to get permission ti create blueprints and copy your buildings

Diese Aufkleber gibt es doch schon im Spiel. Passen sich der Oberfläche an.

Aber als Textur Ersatz brauche es zu viele Ressourcen

Quote from VivianHaley

I know it's been a while, but when it comes to measuring tools for building, I've found that having a good-quality tape measure is a must. It's super versatile and can handle a lot of different jobs. I also like using a level to make sure everything is straight—nothing worse than a wonky shelf.

there is a tape ingame that you can use for such. also when its about leveling (of shelves i.e.) you can easily do that by checking on the rotation angle the game is showing you. or just use the grid.

I think you confuse yourself a bit.

Hit F3 3 times. Now you don't have all the unnecessary Parameters and only the x, y and z coordinates.

Easy to figure out which one is the height level you are on.

Surface height plays no role here