Posts by Minotorious

Quote from Sethlea

where do i download the portal

First post on this thread

If I am not mistaken this was actually planned for the java version so I assume it still is for the Unity one

Quote from yahwho

The website wiki.rising-world.co.uk is a public wiki which anyone can edit and uses the same software as Wikipedia.

That is good

The only concern someone might have over a privately owned wiki domain also tieing with Yaromid 's post too would be that you can't ensure it will be available forever while with a fandom or gamepedia domain you are certain that so long as the company exists it will be there, i.e. no concerns over if the owner will pay for the domain or the server hosting it etc.

They also have tools for the devs to make the wiki official by appointing their moderators etc. It is more dev controlled that way and not so unofficial.

Having said that private wikis/websites do exist and prosper in many gaming communities, it all comes down to the effort and dedication of the people behind it and the execution of their ideas.

Quote from Avanar

Bogus and yaromid chose a wiki software and we are just getting familiar with it, already prepared some texts and will publish them once ready

And the name of said wiki software is?

Quote from Avanar

There are for sure several ways to go. We have chosen a path and will follow it. In the end its important to take a decision and follow that way

Cool, yes ofc that is the most important thing. Btw what is that direction as I quickly scanned through the German thread but can't seem to see any specific mentions other than the discord server.

Quote from yahwho

Fandom is covered in adverts.

True though adblock haha But joke aside the advantage of fandom is that it is fully publicly editable and anyone can, when they have time, join and leave the wiki project as they please.

Just curious but why not a fandom hosted domain site as most games nowadays have?

Haven't followed the German forum discussion tbh if that is what you are actually doing

Quote from sharkbitefischer

Minotorious could you please make your plugin available ziped? My antivirus won't let me download it in .jar form

even if I turn it off. sorry.

Huh, weird, let me see if I can add it now

oooh I see, hmm that is tough one I would wait until red51 sees this thread, he might have a way around that.

As far as I am aware if you are after the 2 week refund period steam policy states there is no way to get a refund for that key

yep I tested too and it does compile and seem to work correctly but since the IDE error shows up I would try to either fix it or use something else instead just in case.

btw removing the final flags from the variables fixes the warning but no idea why tbh.

PS: not sure if you saw my message above after I last edited it but I would recommend using switch anyway as it is faster than if

hey so I was in a hurry before when I replied and basically wanted to also ask as to why you are want to use a byte instead of an int, you already mentioned that it is for optimisation but I am not sure if that is actually the case.

See this thread for example, it has a much better explanation than what I could write here about the topic: https://stackoverflow.com/ques…ead-of-int-and-float-inst

Also according to oracle's documentation: byte: The byte data type is an 8-bit signed two's complement integer. It has a minimum value of -128 and a maximum value of 127 (inclusive). The byte data type can be useful for saving memory in large arrays, where the memory savings actually matters. They can also be used in place of int where their limits help to clarify your code; the fact that a variable's range is limited can serve as a form of documentation.

Did some more testing now and even though I am not sure why the else if brings up that warning I know that switch doesn't so to be safe I would recommend using that instead (it is also faster in most cases)

switch(b){
    case ONE:
        System.out.println("A");
        break;
    case TWO:
        System.out.println("B");
        break;
    case THREE:
        System.out.println("C");
        break;
    case FOUR:
        System.out.println("D");
        break;
    default: 
        System.out.println("X");
}

// or the new version thereof
switch(b){
    case ONE -> System.out.println("A");
    case TWO -> System.out.println("B");
    case THREE -> System.out.println("C");
    case FOUR -> System.out.println("D");
    default -> System.out.println("X");
}

I will look at it in more detail later but take a look at this one for now, might fix it quickly: https://www.javatpoint.com/java-byte-compare-method

Can't say I remember tbh if it is different for objects

I would think that is intended behaviour as from the game's side the event happened and then a plugin decided to cancel its action.

To avoid the player losing the blocks you would need to add them back to the inventory after cancelling the event

I would recommend a bit more research before jumping to conclusions and crucifying disney/lucasfilms. From my understanding disney wanted to fire her for months anyway and she just handed them a reason in a silver platter.

Maybe her last comment that actually got her fired was not the most controversial thing she did but she definitely did do a lot of the other things they accuse her of e.g. mocking pronouns by adding beep/boop as her pronouns on twitter only to later retract claiming "she didn't understand pronouns" (come on it is 2021...)

The youtuber (Vera something) you posted the link of seems unaware or simply chooses to ignore the other things she did do and there is evidence of.

Not saying that any of that should have got her fired but let's not pretend she was a full on puppy democrat.

Quote from Avanar

For survival.. In that case we can get rid of most work benches. Why have a grinder? Just do it in inventory. Why have a spinning wheel? And so on

I like the idea to recycle unused blocks. But just change the shape with a click is not what I'm used to from rw

Not really the same thing though, all that would change is that instead of picking the shape of a block on the blockbench you would just craft a generic block there and choose the shape when placing it.

Gameplay-wise it doesn't change anything really unlike getting rid of crafting benches that you mentioned. Also the recycling would still be there for when you made too many blocks of a specific kind that you no longer need.

Unless ofc you really need the immersion value of a block costing 4 stone while a half block costing 2 stone or a triangle block 3 stone to make etc.

The first option is exactly what 7d2d does for the blocks and it is the most convenient thing ever, I have countless times crafted the wrong shape in RW

red51 ich fände das auch eine gute Idee, könnten wir vielleicht drei neue "Flags" (wie die English, German, English/German) erstellen? So dass alle Plugins in dem gleichen Ordner bleiben.

Also etwas wie Singleplayer (grün: #7fbf7b), Multiplayer (lila: #af8dc3), Singleplayer/Multiplayer (gelb: #d8b365 oder #ffffbf)?

Quote from wa130983

I had like potatoes all over the place and they just kept hanging mid air for hours, so I did not see that happening. But thanks for info I guess I have to look at some setting for how long I allow items to be laying around, remember I changed that because they kept loosing there tools, but that is some time ago, so I'll goo dicking, anyhow thanks.

it is the settings_item_despawntime (see for more info: Overview of "server.properties")

Quote from wa130983

I anyone tries this and get frustrated about the potato mess all over the place, I have created a potato cleaner can be added by adding these lines to the original right after the impulse:

        PotatoCleaner potatoCleaner = new PotatoCleaner(projectile);
        Timer killProjectile = new Timer(1, 2, 0, potatoCleaner);
        killProjectile.start();

And create a PotatoCleaner.java in the same folder as original source file with :

package net.risingworld.api.example.customitem.gun;

import net.risingworld.api.objects.WorldItem;

public class PotatoCleaner implements Runnable{
    private WorldItem potato;
    public PotatoCleaner(WorldItem pota)
{
potato = pota;
}
    public void run()
{
        potato.destroy();
}
}

Basically it creates a timer that destroy the potato after a 2 count.

Display More

FYI they disappear by themselves after a minute or so anyway